<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Validation and Reliance on Third Parties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ellywilliams.co.uk/2007/04/20/validation-and-reliance-on-third-parties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ellywilliams.co.uk/2007/04/20/validation-and-reliance-on-third-parties/</link>
	<description>Caught Between Industries</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:39:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Billigflüge</title>
		<link>http://blog.ellywilliams.co.uk/2007/04/20/validation-and-reliance-on-third-parties/comment-page-1/#comment-531117</link>
		<dc:creator>Billigflüge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ellywilliams.co.uk/2007/04/20/validation-and-reliance-on-third-parties/#comment-531117</guid>
		<description>Well Runa, I think that the validation has a crucial influence to your site! It just depends on if you want to be found easily by search engines. Therefor your codes have to be clear and your site valid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Runa, I think that the validation has a crucial influence to your site! It just depends on if you want to be found easily by search engines. Therefor your codes have to be clear and your site valid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://blog.ellywilliams.co.uk/2007/04/20/validation-and-reliance-on-third-parties/comment-page-1/#comment-525030</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 13:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ellywilliams.co.uk/2007/04/20/validation-and-reliance-on-third-parties/#comment-525030</guid>
		<description>Hey Geordie Gal...

I think looking at your source and the validation error mountain it really isn&#039;t that bad. Fixing one error typically fixes many more and I doubt whether there are more than a handful of errors in total.

On closer inspection, fixing all of these errors is gonna be snap as it&#039;s it fairly straight-forward wordpress install.

I honestly don&#039;t mind doing this for you if you like... (you got my email)

Rob (A fellow Geordie, away from home)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Geordie Gal&#8230;</p>
<p>I think looking at your source and the validation error mountain it really isn&#8217;t that bad. Fixing one error typically fixes many more and I doubt whether there are more than a handful of errors in total.</p>
<p>On closer inspection, fixing all of these errors is gonna be snap as it&#8217;s it fairly straight-forward wordpress install.</p>
<p>I honestly don&#8217;t mind doing this for you if you like&#8230; (you got my email)</p>
<p>Rob (A fellow Geordie, away from home)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Runa</title>
		<link>http://blog.ellywilliams.co.uk/2007/04/20/validation-and-reliance-on-third-parties/comment-page-1/#comment-332489</link>
		<dc:creator>Runa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 13:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ellywilliams.co.uk/2007/04/20/validation-and-reliance-on-third-parties/#comment-332489</guid>
		<description>First question: the validation doesn&#039;t have a direct influence on your own site, for the moment it just means your site is accessible for its code is correct and &quot;standard&quot;. 

Second question: it only depends on you. The site-validation is &quot;something more&quot; for a good site with a lot of visits, it doesn&#039;t have a big importance for small or medium one.

Third question: Probably you can manage your delicious account to produce valid XHTML code. Don&#039;t think to change the standard xhtml in html, it wouldn&#039;t be good at all.

Greetings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First question: the validation doesn&#8217;t have a direct influence on your own site, for the moment it just means your site is accessible for its code is correct and &#8220;standard&#8221;. </p>
<p>Second question: it only depends on you. The site-validation is &#8220;something more&#8221; for a good site with a lot of visits, it doesn&#8217;t have a big importance for small or medium one.</p>
<p>Third question: Probably you can manage your delicious account to produce valid XHTML code. Don&#8217;t think to change the standard xhtml in html, it wouldn&#8217;t be good at all.</p>
<p>Greetings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
